Simplified workflow for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers
For many researchers, Peer Review is a frustrating experience filled with ad-hoc processes, drawn out delays, and unnecessary work requests.
ScienceBank’s Peer-Review workflow is based on its core principle to provide authors a Critical Expert Review versus a simple Accept or Reject. We provide tools and guidelines that empower Editors to prioritize the scope of what is critical for Authors to focus on. Furthermore, Authors can respond to reviews and receive responses directly in our comments section. This makes publishing a more collaborative process.
